Type to search

health health news nutrition

Store Brand Formulas Found to be Nutritionally Equivalent to More Expensive Brands According to Recent Federal Court Hearing

This is a Sponsored Post written by me on behalf of PBM Products. All opinions are 100% mine.

PBM Products LLC which supplies store brand infant products to Wal-Mart, Sam’s Club, Target, Kroger and Wal-Greens received $13.5 million in damages from a false advertising lawsuit against Mead Johnson and CO, the makers of Enfamil® LIPIL®.

PBM’s Store brand formulas cost up to 50% less than Enfamil®. ThePBM’s formulas do not contain the same nutritional value as Mead Johnson’s brands.

PBM’s CEO Paul B. Manning stated that, “This decision by a jury of the people confirms that Mead Johnson’s ads have been false in suggesting that there is a nutritional difference between our store brand formula products and their products, when in fact the only major difference is price.”

The case examined two nutritional supplements, DHA (docosahexaenoic acid) and ARA (arachidonic acid) Mead Johnson calls these supplements LIPIL® for marketing purposes only. They claim that it helps with infant eye development. PBM stated that Mead Johnson mailed a blurry photo of a child‘s toy duck which was next to a clear picure of the same image to over 1.6 million parents. The direct mailing suggested that anything other than the Enfamil® LIPIL® blend of ingredients is inferior and will result in poor eye and brain development.

This is the third time that PBM has sued Mead Johnson for false advertising claims. Although we agree with the court and jury’s verdict Healthy Moms strongly recommends that you feed your infant breast milk for the first 12 months. There isn’t a single infant formula on the market today that compares to the nutritional value found in nature’s finest, mother’s milk.

Related  Get Motivated to Lose Weight with a Weight Watchers® Digital Scale (Giveaway)

SocialSpark Disclosure Badge

Discuss this in our forum

Was this article helpful? If not search the Healthy Moms Mag community forum to find answers to your question. Our community is free to join or you can browse and post as a guest.

Search Our Community

Link to this post:

<a href="https://healthymomsmagazine.net/2010/01/store-brand-formulas-found-to-be-nutritionally-equivalent-to-more-expensive-brands-according-to-recent-federal-court-hearing.html">Store Brand Formulas Found to be Nutritionally Equivalent to More Expensive Brands According to Recent Federal Court Hearing</a>

0/5 (0 Reviews)
Taking Care of Your Family's Health and Well-being, Saints to Turn to, and the Catholic Faith
Cascia Talbert

Cascia Talbert is a devout Catholic, mother of five children, health and fitness enthusiast and positive parenting supporter. She is also the founder of the award winning online health, fitness, parenting and Christian faith magazine for moms, the Healthy Moms Magazine. She lives in the Chicago suburbs with her husband, five children and one spoiled cat. Her hobbies include gardening, country music, running, and playing her flute. Check out her first book, "Taking Care of your Family's Health and Well-being, Saints to Turn to and the Catholic Faith," available exclusively on Amazon.

    1

4 Comments

  1. jennielee226 January 9, 2010

    My mother and I used to argue about this when my children were smaller. I switched to formula after my 3rd child was unable to breast feed and my mother insisted on buying me the expensive formula rather than the store brand formula that I could buy myself.
    Her argument was that if wic would only use the expensive formula than it must be better.
    Now I wonder if the government isn't wasting money but not using store brand formula

  2. amandaautismx2 January 10, 2010

    Wanting to let you know that I have changed my website address. It is now at autismandtheworldaroundme.blogspot.com Please continue to visit me here. Thank you!

  3. Amy January 11, 2010

    Happy Monday..