Sex, Gender, and Politics

Enter the Hangout

After over one million Americans vowed to boycott Target over their transgender bathroom policy, sex, gender and public safety has been one of the top headlines in the media. Target’s stock plummeted, and stories about every day Americans worried about their children’s safety in their neighborhood Target stores have trended on social media. Allowing men who identify as being female into public women’s bathrooms does pose a danger to our safety. Bringing this issue into the forefront is another stupid move by the left to try to cater to a small minority. I do not want a man to be allowed in the same bathroom as myself and my daughters. For decades common sense has determined which bathroom someone used. It was an unspoken rule that if you were born a boy you used the boys’ bathroom and if you were born a girl you used the girl’s bathroom.

After digging into this controversy a little further I learned that just a few years ago Osha released a guide to bathroom access to transgender workers. So this means that the same bathroom policy that Target is imposing is legal in all 50 states according to Federal Law. This is disgusting and the left should not have ever brought this up in the first place. We need to restore common sense for public safety.

I am honored to feature this guest post regarding transgender bathroom policy, common sense and public safety by Dr. Elizabeth Vliet, the Chief Medical Officer of Med Expert Chile and past Director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Cascia Talbert
Founder
healthymoms_logo


Sex, Gender, and Politics: Restore Common Sense and Public Safety

Some claim that sexual orientation is a preference, not genetic, and therefore can be changed. However, nothing is more clearly genetic than our biological sex. It is determined by our two “sex” chromosomes, one from each parent. Two X chromosomes determine a biological female, while one X and one Y chromosome determine a biological male. The Y chromosome can only come from the child’s father.

But in the 21st century, “gender” has moved beyond biology, morphing into a new construct that is part socio-cultural, part ideological, and part political: that gender is based on one’s self-perception of being male or female, and is changeable.

Bathroom

Hence we have controversial legislation allowing self-selection of public bathrooms by transgender individuals—or anyone who claims to be transgender.

“Social equality” activists believe that one’s feeling of gender cannot be questioned by the rest of society, and policies should be made according to the individual’s assumption of gender rather than biological sex. Such self-perceptions are rarely considered the criteria used for decision-making in other areas of medicine, psychiatry, or social policy. To do so across the board would result in chaos.

Some claim that sexual orientation is a preference, not genetic, and therefore can be changed. However, nothing is more clearly genetic than our biological sex. It is determined by our two “sex” chromosomes, one from each parent. Two X chromosomes determine a biological female, while one X and one Y chromosome determine a biological male. The Y chromosome can only come from the child’s father.

But in the 21st century, “gender” has moved beyond biology, morphing into a new construct that is part socio-cultural, part ideological, and part political: that gender is based on one’s self-perception of being male or female, and is changeable.

Hence we have controversial legislation allowing self-selection of public bathrooms by transgender individuals—or anyone who claims to be transgender.

“Social equality” activists believe that one’s feeling of gender cannot be questioned by the rest of society, and policies should be made according to the individual’s assumption of gender rather than biological sex. Such self-perceptions are rarely considered the criteria used for decision-making in other areas of medicine, psychiatry, or social policy. To do so across the board would result in chaos.

In medicine and psychiatry/psychology, we recognize that self-perception may be distorted and not consistent with observable phenomena. False self-perceptions or assumptions can have serious, and possibly lethal, consequences.

Consider these common examples in medicine:

  • An alcoholic has self-perception that he/she is sober, then decides to drive while legally intoxicated, crashes into another car, and kills a whole family.
  • A diabetic has a self-perception that blood sugars are normal, doesn’t check or treat them, and then falls into a coma from either hypo or hyperglycemia.
  • A patient with high blood pressure has self-perception that blood pressure is “normal”, doesn’t check or treat it, then has a stroke due to severe hypertension.
  • A young woman with anorexia nervosa has self-perception that she is grossly fat, yet has lost so much weight that she dies from malnutrition.
  • A young man with body dysmorphic disorder has a fixed self-perception that he is “grossly ugly” and commits suicide, in spite of appearing being a normal, good-looking young man.

I think most people would agree that the individuals described above should be helped with treatment, not allowed to continue in their detrimental self-perception. As medical professionals, our job becomes helping that person’s self-perception match the medical reality so that proper therapeutic interventions may be offered, and lives spared.
Transgender patients, who make up 0.3% of the U.S. population, have a similar disorder of assumption. One of the largest and longest studies, published in 2011 from the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, followed 324 individuals for up to 30 years after sex-reassignment surgery.

Researchers found an alarming 20-fold increase in death by suicide among the transgender individuals compared to a non-transgender population. Further, about 10 years after the sex-reassignment surgery transgender individuals began developing higher rates of mental disorders such as depression.

Johns Hopkins, the first American medical center to perform gender-reassignment surgery and to have a comprehensive team evaluation and treatment program, developed an outcomes study starting in the 1970s to evaluate post-surgical psycho-social adjustment. The Hopkins study found no better psychological outcomes for the group who had surgery vs. those who did not. The Hopkins team decided to stop performing high risk sex-reassignment surgeries that had no long-term benefit.

My personal experience as a physician agrees with the studies. I have scrubbed in on gender-reassignment surgery. It is lengthy, complex, risky—and expensive. Many procedures are needed, and patients have long, painful recoveries. I have treated a number of patients who had it done.

Even with surgery and lifelong hormone therapy to maintain a feminized body, transgender men are still biologically male even though they have assumed the social role and appearance of a woman. They still have the XY chromosome makeup, and need prostate monitoring for later cancer.

The reality is quite different from simply granting a patient’s preferences. Reality cannot be changed. Perception of reality can be. Our goal should be to “do no harm” in our treatment. Since long-term studies show that transgender patients who have sex-reassignment surgery may actually suffer more emotional distress over time, treatment should be focused on the underlying mental disorder, that commonly is not “fixed” by surgery.

Giving in to activists’ demands, Medicare ruled in 2014 that it would pay for surgical costs for those over 65 who perceived they were males “trapped” in female bodies or females in male bodies. Private Bradley (now Chelsea) Manning, found guilty of crimes of leaking classified documents and imprisoned, had sex-reassignment surgery at taxpayer expense.

Meanwhile, Medicare denies payment for hormone replacement treatment for menopause or andropause; has reduced payments for hospice care, home health care, physical therapy, and hospital re-admissions for seriously ill patients; and is approving fewer hip, knee, shoulder, and back surgeries.

Instead of seeking a sound therapeutic approach to help patients with their misperceptions, activists are ignoring the studies and demanding that society pay for wish-fulfilling but potentially harmful and risky surgeries.
The left’s politically correct social engineering is refusing to protect women and girls from sexual predators pretending to be transgender. This ideological agenda continues a war on women jeopardizing lives to satisfy a miniscule minority.

Bureaucrats endanger lives by rationing standard treatments for Medicare beneficiaries and shifting funds to costly surgeries harmful to the troubled people it claims to help. Politicians are a danger to public safety and personal privacy when they replace reality and common sense with radical ideology.

Dr. Elizabeth VlietAbout this Author:  Elizabeth Lee Vliet, M.D., Dr. Vliet is Chief Medical Officer of Med Expert Chile, SpA, an international medical consulting company based in Santiago, Chile whose mission is high quality, lower cost medical care focused on preserving medical freedom, privacy, and the Oath of Hippocrates commitment to individual patients. Dr. Vliet is a past Director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS). Dr. Vliet also has an active US medical practice in Tucson AZ and Dallas TX specializing in preventive and climacteric medicine with an integrated approach to evaluation and treatment of women and men with complex medical and hormonal problems. Dr. Vliet received a NECO 2014 Ellis Island Medal of Honor and the Arizona Foundation for Women 2007 Voice of Women award for her pioneering medical and educational advocacy for overlooked hormone connections in women’s health. She received her M.D. degree and internship in Internal Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School, and completed specialty training at Johns Hopkins Hospital. She earned her B.S. and Master’s degrees from the College of William and Mary in Virginia. Dr. Vliet has appeared on FOX NEWS, Cavuto, Stuart Varney Show, Fox and Friends, Sean Hannity and many nationally syndicated radio shows across the country as well as numerous Healthcare Town Halls addressing the economic and medical impact of the 2010 healthcare law. Dr. Vliet is a past co-host of America’s Fabric radio show. Dr. Vliet’s health books include: It’s My Ovaries, Stupid; Screaming To Be Heard: Hormonal Connections Women Suspect– And Doctors STILL Ignore; Women, Weight and Hormones; The Savvy Woman’s Guide to Great Sex, Strength, and Stamina, and The Savvy Woman’s Guide to PCOS. Dr. Vliet’s websites are www.HerPlace.com, and www.MedExpertChile.com.

Sex, Gender, and Politics
Rate this post

Don't Miss An Article Subscribe Below

The Number One Health Blog for Moms
Enter your email address:
 



Leave a Reply